Meet us Nothing scheduled right now.
For instance, the people who routinely get themselves screened for being a carrier for Tay-Sachs disease are a demographic who have an extremely strong historical reason to be worried about Nazi-style dysgenics, and yet, eugenics is exactly what they are doing whenever a couple of them, on learning that they are both carriers, decide to refrain from having children together, or break off their relationship and seek other, non-carrier partners.
The Nazis thought they were practising eugenics. From their point of view, they were improving the gene pool: People will disagree on which types of eugenics are good and which are bad. We need a better way of referring to the method. Jun September 11, at That more clearly indicates the salient differences between the two, and also avoids coding our own values into the name.
Deiseach September 11, at 1: Nornagest September 11, at 1: Formalized discrimination against Jews began as early asalmost immediately after the Nazis came to power.
Mary September 11, at 3: After the putsch, as early as the trial, they wrapped it up in ethnic nationalism as a better sell. Most Germans were sold that, which lead in due course to the original anti-Semitism. Indeed, many observers thought at the time that Hitler had gotten over his earlier attitude on Jews.
David Hart September 11, at 6: Vilhelm S September 11, at 5: Of course, not everyone will agree exactly with this formulation. Hainish September 13, at 9: I think the word is just so.PROVIDENCE, R.I.
— For the record, democracy has a pulse in Precinct The roughly three-block rectangle of city streets surrounding Roger Williams National Memorial had garnered the.
As a follow-up to Tuesday’s post about the majority-minority public schools in Oslo, the following brief account reports the latest statistics on the cultural enrichment of schools in Austria. Vienna is the most fully enriched location, and seems to be in roughly the same situation as Oslo.
Many thanks to Hermes for the translation from attheheels.com Should Mandatory HIV Testing be Legal? One of the more controversial issues of today is HIV. After comparing two essays with two different viewpoints on this topic, I found one to be more persuasive than the other.
Hypothetical Treatment of Ethical Dilemma - This paper is an analysis of a hypothetical vignette in which a counselor-in-training named Callie, a fairly experienced and nearly-licensed counselor supervisee, approaches her counselor supervisor for advice and direction regarding an ethical dilemma.
Risk is the possibility of losing something of value.
Values (such as physical health, social status, emotional well-being, or financial wealth) can be gained or lost when taking risk resulting from a given action or inaction, foreseen or unforeseen (planned or not planned).Risk can also be defined as the intentional interaction with uncertainty.
Thus, mandatory HIV testing is inadequate and unethical, and by no means should it be considered a “simple” shortcut to getting HIV-positive patients to help prevent the spread of HIV to others. HIV testing needs to be part of a “package” of support and care services.