There was a significant correlation between extroversion and life satisfaction. However, life satisfaction was not significantly related to college adjustment. In general, I would suggest writing the words of the results section first, and then going back to insert the numbers and statistical information.
How to write a research report in psychology J. Baron, with help from R. Rescorla and an appendix by M. Seligman Sections of the report Title. This should say as much as possible about the content of the paper, in as few words as possible.
This is a brief usually one paragraph summary of the whole paper, including the problem, the method for solving it when not obviousthe results, and the conclusions suggested or drawn.
Do not write the abstract as a hasty Discussion research paper psychology. Look at it as a real exercise in cramming the most information in one paragraph. The reader should not have to read any of the rest of the paper in order to understand the abstract fully.
Its purpose is to allow the reader to decide whether to read the paper or not. A reader who does not want to read the paper should be able to read the abstract instead. Tell the reader what the problem is, what question you will try to answer, and why it is important.
It might be important for practical reasons or for theoretical or methodological reasons having to do with the development of a scholarly discipline. If the problem is a very basic one, you may state the problem first and then review what has already been found out about it. If the problem is one that grows out of past literature, review the history of how it arose.
But do not forget to mention the basic issues behind the research tradition in question, the practical or theoretical concerns that inspired it.
In this case, you have probably chosen the wrong topic.
Your literature review should be appropriate to the kind of paper you are writing. If it is a thesis, you should strive for completeness, both in reviewing all the relevant literature and in making the main arguments clear to a reader who is unfamiliar with that literature.
For a course paper or journal article, it is sufficient to review the main papers that are directly relevant. Again, you should assume that your reader has not read them, but you need not go into detail.
You should review only those points that are relevant to the arguments you will make. This is essentially what is new about your approach, your particular contribution. It need not be anything great. This section gives the details of how you went about your project.
It is usually divided into subsections such as subjects, materials, and procedure. These subheadings are standard ones, but they are not always appropriate, and other subheadings are acceptable. The point of subheadings is that the reader may want to skip this section entirely and return to it later in the paper.
The subheadings should make it easy to find relevant details. This is a summary of what you actually found. It is not a dump of your unanalyzed data, nor merely a report of whether your statistical tests were significant, but somewhere in between.
It should contain whatever summary statistics will help readers see for themselves what happened, such as means and standard deviations of various conditions, and raw correlations, when these are relevant.
It should also contain the results of statistical tests. Make sure to do and report just those tests that are relevant to the question that inspired your project. If you must include your raw data and sometimes there is good reason to do thisput them in an appendix.
Graphs, charts, and tables are often useful in this section and elsewhere, but less often.An excerpt from the discussion section of a chemistry report An excerpt from the Discussion section of a psychology report.
the present research design has successfully avoided the criticism of ‘lacking real world characteristics’ directed at other research testing Kelley’s covariation theory, research such as Pike & Bewer ( Department of Psychology, Boston College, McGuinn Hall, Room , Commonwealth discussion).
Thus, the first two hypotheses, that emotional information maintains its importance Sample One-Experiment Paper (continued). Writing the Discussion The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's. Your discussion should begin with a cogent, one-paragraph summary of the study's key findings, but then go beyond that to put the findings into context, says Stephen Hinshaw, PhD, chair of the psychology department at the University of California, Berkeley.
Psychology Research Papers: Discussion Section Advice. The discussion part of a research paper is the part of the composition where the author addresses both sides of an issue and raises some new questions that have arisen from there research.
Explaining the meaning of the results to the reader is the purpose of the discussion section of a research paper. There are elements of the discussion that should be included and other things that should be avoided. Always write the discussion for the reader; remember that the focus should be to help the How to Write an Effective Discussion.